Re: Great Black-Hawk correction


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TAS BirdBoard ] [ FAQ ]


Posted by Bill Pranty on 11:49:53 12/12/07

In Reply to: Great Black-Hawk correction posted by Rock Jetty

You are correct; nice catch.

The fact that that the Great Black-Hawk is a sedentary resident from northern Mexico south through Middle America to northern Argentina and Uruguay (AOU 1998) should dispel any thoughts that the Florida birds are natural vagrants.

A non-migratory bird would be as unable to fly across the Gulf of Mexico as much as a non-swimmer would be able to swim across it.**

Plus, the Crandon Park Zoo was known to have various exotics in the 1960s and 1970s (such as Black-bellied Whistling-Ducks, Great Kiskadees [!], and Red-crested Cardinals -- and I'm not even mentioning the amazing waterfowl assemblage present now due to recent releases), so one has to wonder whether they ever had Great Black-Hawks as well...

**Finally, I'll reiterate out that there is no verifiable evidence (photos or specimens) that the Virginia Key _Buteogallus_ are Great Black-Hawks. Including the sole bird photographed, the birds have been identified as both Great Black-Hawk and Cuban Black-Hawks.

It would be great if somebody could get photographs of the birds so that we could at least agree on their identity.


Best regards,

Bill Pranty
Bayonet Point, Florida



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:
Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TAS BirdBoard ] [ FAQ ]